Hi,
Leonid Lisovskiy wrote,

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@uclibc-ng.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently, we need just to know that library was opened more than
> >> once. Sorry if DL_OPENED2 name introduces misunderstanding, I could
> >> easily rename it to any better variant.
> >
> > Than may be we should rename it to a better variant.
> > Could you resend v2 with that fixed?
>
> Of course, yes. What name is the best from your point of view?

No idea. I just dislike DL_OPENED2 if no DL_OPENED is in use :)