1 Mar
2017
1 Mar
'17
7:10 p.m.
On 03/01/2017 10:57 AM, Anton Kolesov wrote:
> That means for building of our toolchain we'll
need to have separately stored
> "defconfigs" in some form. Let's see what Anton says on that :)
But why is that - as long as buildroot (or other build systems) pass the right cpu
flags - why do you need a seperate config ?
> And regardless of what mr Anton says having
off-the-tree defconfigs is not
> the best idea because with time options will go in and out and occasionally
> we'll have outdated defconfigs.
The whole out-of-tree defconfig approach is nonsense - lets not discuss it !
[AK] Not specifying architecture via uClibc config
file is good for me - I
wanted this long ago, since I never understood why current approach was used in
the first place.