1 Mar
2017
1 Mar
'17
6:35 p.m.
On 03/01/2017 10:25 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
I didn't read Thomas' proposal that way. IMHO it would be better to stage it by
first folding arch defconfigs into arch min/full and later if possible merge them
in arch independent min/full ?
That was
a fair requirement on their part but it kept bloating uClibc for our typical
embedded use. But this idea of minimal vs. full featured is exactly what we need.
@Alexey / @vlad can we take this up please !
Probably Waldemar's opinion might
be useful here.
@Waldemar are there any plans for busting arch-specific defconfigs in favor
to generic defconfigs like those "minimal" and "full" mentioned
above?