30 Nov
2016
30 Nov
'16
7:55 a.m.
>>>> "Waldemar" == Waldemar
Brodkorb <wbx(a)uclibc-ng.org> writes:
Hi,
I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
before doing it.
I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more
complex and
the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is
enabled by default.
I agree. The size saving is really quite small. We did the same thing in
Buildroot last year.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard