30 Nov
2016
30 Nov
'16
7:55 a.m.
"Waldemar" == Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@uclibc-ng.org> writes:
Hi, I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS before doing it.
I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.
I agree. The size saving is really quite small. We did the same thing in Buildroot last year. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard