20 May
2016
20 May
'16
8:26 a.m.
On Friday 20 May 2016 12:57 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1(a)synopsys.com> wrote:
Is this is question - ARC is a rela ABI and this fell thru cracks as it was not
being exercised at all due to lack of DT_RELACOUNT support in binutils so far.
From: Cupertino Miranda
<cmiranda(a)synopsys.com>
Wih new bintuils supporting DT_RELACOUNT, ldso was crashing as it was
parsing relocs incorrectly.
Apparently that code ran for first time and was never tested.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta(a)synopsys.com>
---
ldso/ldso/arc/dl-sysdep.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ldso/ldso/arc/dl-sysdep.h b/ldso/ldso/arc/dl-sysdep.h
index b6bda9d14691..caece997d254 100644
--- a/ldso/ldso/arc/dl-sysdep.h
+++ b/ldso/ldso/arc/dl-sysdep.h
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static __always_inline void
elf_machine_relative (Elf32_Addr load_off, const Elf32_Addr rel_addr,
Elf32_Word relative_count)
{
- Elf32_Rel * rpnt = (void *) rel_addr;
+ Elf32_Rela * rpnt = (void *) rel_addr;
This is ok
> --rpnt;
> do {
> Elf32_Addr *const reloc_addr = (void *) (load_off +
(++rpnt)->r_offset);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc(a)uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc