26 Jan
2017
26 Jan
'17
10:09 p.m.
Hi Max, Max Filippov wrote,
Why is it left here?
I have taken this from the GNU C library changeset, but it seems unneeded. I asked the author of the patch and it seems there is no reason to keep it.
+ //sigset_t set; + //__libc_signal_block_app (&set);
Why adding commented out code instead of using e.g. sigprocmask?
It was a leftover I wanted to fix later. Good catch. I now synced the required code. I am planning to push the updated patch. Thanks for all reviews and comments. best regards Waldemar