26 Jan
2017
26 Jan
'17
10:09 p.m.
Hi Max,
Max Filippov wrote,
It was a leftover I wanted to fix later. Good catch.
I now synced the required code.
I am planning to push the updated patch.
Thanks for all reviews and comments.
best regards
Waldemar
Why is it left here?
I have taken this from the GNU C library changeset, but it seems
unneeded. I asked the author of the patch and it seems there is no
reason to keep it.
+ //sigset_t
set;
+ //__libc_signal_block_app (&set);
Why adding commented out code instead of using e.g. sigprocmask?