1 Jun
2016
1 Jun
'16
5:52 p.m.
Hi Alexey,
Alexey Brodkin wrote,
Hi Waldemar,
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 06:15 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Normally I try to run with latest LTS kernel for the testing.
I updated ARC tests to use 4.6. (one failure disappeared)
Hi,
Waldemar Brodkorb wrote,
Thank you so much for doing that, appreciate it a lot!
I'm wondering if there's a reason why did you use Linux 4.4
instead of latest (4.6)? Since we push all out stuff upstream
chances are some failures won't happen with more recent kernel.
Hi,
Waldemar Brodkorb wrote,
Here are the 1.0.15 results:
http://tests.embedded-test.org/uClibc-ng/1.0.15/
Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
>
> On Sunday 29 May 2016 01:30 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >
> > ARC has between 28-30 failures even with latest binutils/gcc
> Latest here is pretty overloaded :-) We had 2016.03 release recently and then
> there's bleeding edge binutils atleast which is tracking pretty close to
upstream
> binutils.
>
> What exact versions of these tools are you using.
I am using 2016.03. I wanted to say latest release :=)
The 1.0.15 testrun is not yet finished, but I think it is
simply reproducable by running nsim and uclibcng-testrunner.sh.
Nsim is nice to
script, but the performance
is pretty bad. Running the testsuite takes for the four combinations
(arc700,archs,little and big mode) mostly the same time as
running all the other tests in Qemu :)
1 CORE 100 % CPU...
Would be NSIM Pro faster? Also from the logs it's not clear what tools were
used?
Was it latest stable arc-2016.03, previous arc-2015.12?
I'd like to have this information to narrow down investigation of
failure reasons.
arc-2016.03 is used here. I will add some information about
OpenADK git version used and GCC/Binutils used for running the stuff
in the future.
best regards
Waldemar