5 Jul
2018
5 Jul
'18
8:51 a.m.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 09:49, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni(a)bootlin.com> wrote:
Hello Christophe,
Thanks for this work on ARM FDPIC support. I'm starting to look at
integrating this in Buildroot. However, I have one question below.
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 17:55:13 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Yes, this was discussed when I submitted the binutils patches:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-03/msg00324.html
On ARM, the FDPIC register is r9 [1], and the
target name is
arm-uclinuxfdpiceabi. Note that arm-uclinux exists, but uses another
The arm-uclinuxfdpiceabi tuple looks weird. Indeed, most architecture
tuples have the form:
<arch>-<vendor>-<os>-<libc/abi>
Where the "vendor" part is optional.
However, with arm-uclinuxfdpiceabi there is no dash separating the OS
("uclinux") from the libc/abi part of the tuple.
Is this expected ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com