5 Jul
2018
5 Jul
'18
8:56 a.m.
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:51:01 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
It seems like a strange choice. Why not arm-uclinux-fdpiceabi ? Anyway,
I guess this is now fixed in stone :)
Also, side question: do you support both EABI and EABIhf, i.e is
arm-uclinuxfdpiceabihf supported ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
However, with
arm-uclinuxfdpiceabi there is no dash separating the OS
("uclinux") from the libc/abi part of the tuple.
Is this expected ?
Yes, this was discussed when I submitted the binutils patches:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-03/msg00324.html