Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
+CC Thomas for buildroot aspect
On 11/29/2016 09:31 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
before doing it.
I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.
Attached is a patch.
Any comments?
best regards
Waldemar
I welcome this change - is there going to be impact on downstream projects like
busybox. What if it some disables CONFIG_LFS inside busybox ?
At least it does compile fine and I can bootup a system in Qemu.
I think it will just not work with files bigger than 2GB.
Busybox use LFS mostly for Android systems, if I interpret the code
in libbb.h correctly.
best regards
Waldemar