2 Jun
2016
2 Jun
'16
11 a.m.
Hi Waldemar,
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 19:28 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Alexey Brodkin wrote,
You mean if I'm up to implement this missing feature in uClibc?
Well I'd like to but as well not sure if and when I have time for that :)
For now we have a work-around with mentioned patches. So that's not a showstopper.
-Alexey
Hi Waldemar,
On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 14:12 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
I would
prefer this solution. I have started reading the code, but I
can't give you any guarantee when I can work on this.
Do you have free resources to cook up a patch? :)
Hello,
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:55 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:46 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > This fixes util-linux building with uClibc.
> > Patch is taken as it is from Buildroot:
> >
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/plain/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmoun…
> > 506a
> > 6f
> > ea
> > bf114623866568121f49712f5df
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin(a)synopsys.com>
> > ---
> > .../004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch | 153
+++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644
package/utils/util-linux/patches/004-Fix-libmount-build-under-uClibc.patch
We are
discussing one issue with "util-linux" package building.
The problem is in "util-linux" wants to use alloc modifier (either
"%as"
or "%ms") in scanf().
Looks like uClibc still doesn't support neither "%ms" nor "%as"
(this one
is obsolete glibc-specific so let's not bother with it anyways).
Now to work-around this missing requirement we used to use
an off-the-tree patch like this one in Buildroot:
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/tree/package/util-linux/0001-Fix-libmount…
OpenWRT:
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=package/utils/util-linu…
eef0
959bf0c8ce269e8039d4d05ef58e1d527;hb=8a7b28071fba84e297796c46d46e12b0967804e8
Gentoo:
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/util-linu…
.pat
ch?revision=1.2
The question to you is where do you think we should fix mentioned problem:
1) In uClibc-ng with addition of "%ms" support in scanf or