21 Jun
2016
21 Jun
'16
6:56 p.m.
Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
ping?
(resend with better changelog)
On Wednesday 15 June 2016 08:34 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb
wrote:
Hi Vineet,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
This is for a dynamically linked PIE - can we have static linked PIE ? Current
approach of taking addresses of functions, in not position independent but still
works for the normal dynamically linked executables (non PIE) since the zero based
addresses are rightly resolved in final link. This is not true for PIE hence we
need a really position independent way (PC relative addr) to pass those function
addresses.
Do u want me to respin with beefed up changelog.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
<vgupta(a)synopsys.com>
---
libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S b/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S
index 95c41f888850..e38c8e81b2c0 100644
--- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S
+++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S
@@ -41,11 +41,15 @@ __start:
mov_s r5, r0 ; rltd_fini
add_s r2, sp, 4 ; argv
-
+#ifdef L_Scrt1
+ add r0, pcl, @main@pcl
+ add r3, pcl, @_init@pcl
+ add r4, pcl, @_fini@pcl
+#else
mov_s r0, main
mov_s r3, _init
mov r4, _fini
-
+#endif
and sp, sp, -8
mov r6, sp
Can you please be a little more descriptive why this patch is
useful? Will ARC support static PIE or is Scrt1.o used in other
code? Sorry, had to resend with correct sender address.
My address was wrong ?
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc(a)uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc