Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote,
ping? (resend with better changelog)
On Wednesday 15 June 2016 08:34 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi Vineet, Vineet Gupta wrote,
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta vgupta@synopsys.com
libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S b/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S index 95c41f888850..e38c8e81b2c0 100644 --- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S +++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/arc/crt1.S @@ -41,11 +41,15 @@ __start:
mov_s r5, r0 ; rltd_fini add_s r2, sp, 4 ; argv
+#ifdef L_Scrt1
- add r0, pcl, @main@pcl
- add r3, pcl, @_init@pcl
- add r4, pcl, @_fini@pcl
+#else mov_s r0, main mov_s r3, _init mov r4, _fini
+#endif and sp, sp, -8 mov r6, sp
Can you please be a little more descriptive why this patch is useful? Will ARC support static PIE or is Scrt1.o used in other code?
This is for a dynamically linked PIE - can we have static linked PIE ? Current approach of taking addresses of functions, in not position independent but still works for the normal dynamically linked executables (non PIE) since the zero based addresses are rightly resolved in final link. This is not true for PIE hence we need a really position independent way (PC relative addr) to pass those function addresses.
Do u want me to respin with beefed up changelog.
Sorry, had to resend with correct sender address.
My address was wrong ?
uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc