On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx(a)uclibc-ng.org> wrote:
lowlevellock.c
for arm differs from the generic lowlevellock.c only in
insignificant ways, so can be removed. Follow glibc commit 6d96f5e4c0
Thanks, applied and pushed,
Waldemar
I suggest to try to repeat the same action for other platforms using
local lowlevellock.c copy. Starting from xtensa, since it don't use it
at all(no reference to lowlevellock.c in Makefile.in), then - arc,
metag, sparc.
But, unfortunately, I can't make the tests on these platforms myself.
Waldemar, could you help with testing?
Regards,
Leonid