On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 12:07, Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx(a)uclibc-ng.org> wrote:
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Lyon wrote,
Hi,
My recent attempt at submitting the GCC patch series to add FDPIC
support for arm triggered a discussion about -static-pie support [1],
which continued on IRC.
The patch currently supports -static but the resulting binary still
needs the dynamic linker to prepare the parameters for __self_reloc,
and there are arguments that a static binary should not have a
PT_INTERP field.
At present, musl supports -static-pie for sh+FDPIC only.
I think other uclibc-ng targets with FDPIC (frv, bfin) do not support
-static, but I'm not sure how to build such toolchains, nor if they
are still supported.
It seems I have several options:
(a) add support for static-pie to uclibc-ng. This means creating a new
rcrt1.o or similar, which would embed parts of the dynamic linker into
static-pie executables. I'm not sure how big a task this is?
(b) add support for FDPIC on arm to musl, which I'm not familiar with
(c) declare -static not supported on arm-FDPIC
(d) gather consensus that -static with pt_interp is ok (my preference,
since that's what the current patches do :-)
So, my questions are:
- does uclibc-ng support -static on some FDPIC targets? which ones?
- how much work would option (a) mean?
- are uclibc-ng people opposed to option (d)?
I am fine with c). As for static binaries you could use binfmt.
I think blackfin has the same limitation for FDPIC.
I'm still waiting for feedback on the whole series of GCC patches.
Christophe