30 Nov
2016
30 Nov
'16
9:27 a.m.
Opps, didn't notice Vineet has already answered :)
-Alexey
On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 12:25 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Waldemar,
>
> On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 06:31 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
> > before doing it.
> >
> > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
> > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.
> >
> > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.
> >
> > Attached is a patch.
> >
> > Any comments?
>
> Looks good to me, thought maybe Vineet has another opinion on that.
>
> -Alexey