8 Jun
2017
8 Jun
'17
7:31 p.m.
Hi,
I just noticed today that mkostemp64 calls __gen_tempname with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR, while all other flavors call it with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, as per POSIX.1-2008.
See libc/stdlib/mkostemp64.c. I assume I don't need to send a patch
for that.
Cheers,
Ignacy
--
Ignacy Gawędzki
R&D Engineer
Green Communications
8 Jun
8 Jun
7:39 p.m.
Hi Ignacy,
Ignacy Gawedzki wrote,
Hi,
I just noticed today that mkostemp64 calls __gen_tempname with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR, while all other flavors call it with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, as per POSIX.1-2008.
See libc/stdlib/mkostemp64.c. I assume I don't need to send a patch
for that.
A patch is always nice to have no misunderstandings and to clarify
the reporter of the issue in the git log.
And patchwork will remind me if I miss this issue :=)
Could you sent a patch?
P.s.: I whitelisted your new address.
best regards
Waldemar
8 p.m.
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:39:55PM +0200, thus spake Waldemar Brodkorb:
Hi Ignacy,
Ignacy Gawedzki wrote,
:(
Will follow shortly.
Hi,
I just noticed today that mkostemp64 calls __gen_tempname with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR, while all other flavors call it with mode
S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, as per POSIX.1-2008.
See libc/stdlib/mkostemp64.c. I assume I don't need to send a patch
for that.
A patch is always nice to have no misunderstandings and to clarify
the reporter of the issue in the git log.
And patchwork will remind me if I miss this issue :=)
Could you sent a patch? P.s.: I whitelisted your new address.
Forget about it, it's actually my old address. But thanks anyway.
Cheers,
Ignacy
--
Ignacy Gawędzki
R&D Engineer
Green Communications
2724
days inactive
2724
days old
2 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Ignacy Gawedzki -
Ignacy Gawedzki -
Waldemar Brodkorb