Add __adjtimex() ?
uClibc-ng provides adjtimex() function only, but some programs(like ntpd) requires it's alias - __adjtimex(). There were two methods to implement it: 1) OpenWRT way - just a simple #define https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.33.2/120-... 2) glibc way - do it via strong alias Should we implement __adjtimex() in uClibc-ng? Which way is acceptable for mainstream? Regards, Leonid
Hi Leonid, Leonid Lisovskiy wrote,
uClibc-ng provides adjtimex() function only, but some programs(like ntpd) requires it's alias - __adjtimex(). There were two methods to implement it:
1) OpenWRT way - just a simple #define
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/toolchain/uClibc/patches-0.9.33.2/120-...
2) glibc way - do it via strong alias
Should we implement __adjtimex() in uClibc-ng? Which way is acceptable for mainstream?
So you got no other opinions, would you like to cook up a patch integrating it with a strong alias like glibc? best regards Waldemar
Althought recent versions of sofware don't require it, old ntpd wants - see http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769 Signed-off-by: Leonid Lisovskiy <lly.dev@gmail.com> --- include/sys/timex.h | 2 -- libc/sysdeps/linux/common/adjtimex.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/sys/timex.h b/include/sys/timex.h index 57059bd..4cb81d2 100644 --- a/include/sys/timex.h +++ b/include/sys/timex.h @@ -120,9 +120,7 @@ struct timex __BEGIN_DECLS -#if 0 extern int __adjtimex (struct timex *__ntx) __THROW; -#endif extern int adjtimex (struct timex *__ntx) __THROW; libc_hidden_proto(adjtimex) diff --git a/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/adjtimex.c b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/adjtimex.c index 45cb384..1996502 100644 --- a/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/adjtimex.c +++ b/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/adjtimex.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ _syscall1(int, adjtimex, struct timex *, buf) libc_hidden_def(adjtimex) +weak_alias(adjtimex,__adjtimex) #if defined __UCLIBC_NTP_LEGACY__ strong_alias(adjtimex,ntp_adjtime) #endif -- 1.8.5.6
Hi Leonid, Leonid Lisovskiy wrote,
Althought recent versions of sofware don't require it, old ntpd wants - see http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769
Signed-off-by: Leonid Lisovskiy <lly.dev@gmail.com>
Applied and integrated in latest release, best regards Waldemar
participants (3)
-
Leonid Lisovskiy -
Waldemar Brodkorb -
Waldemar Brodkorb