13 Jun
2018
13 Jun
'18
7:50 a.m.
Hello,
I am using openadk on the raspberry pi 3, and have an appliance where I have one main
application that is running all the time.
So I am using gcc 7.2.0 from openadk, and compilation starts to be *very slow* with gcc:
10 minutes for a full rebuild... So I am looking into having the clang toolchain available
next to the gcc one so I can compile only my application with clang, which is faster.
I have several shared libraries I also compile myself as part of my application build, all
using cmake.
So, I used the llvm package under the toolchain dir and modified it so it could build in
another output directory like this:
BUILD_DIR_INITIAL:= $(WRKBUILD)-initial
BUILD_DIR_FINAL:= $(WRKBUILD)-final
TC_INSTALL_DIR:=$(TOOLCHAIN_DIR)
ifeq ($(ADK_BUILD_USERLAND_COMPILER_LLVM),y)
TC_INSTALL_DIR:=$(TOOLCHAIN_USERLAND_DIR)
BUILD_DIR_INITIAL:= $(WRKBUILD)-userland-llvm-initial
BUILD_DIR_FINAL:= $(WRKBUILD)-userland-llvn-final
endif
Then as llvm triple I used this:
LLVM_TRIPLE:=arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf
And the version I used was 5.0.2 of llvm.
So that compiled for me and I got indeed a toolchain in the TOOLCHAIN_USERLAND_DIR
location, which I added in vars.mk. So then I needed a toolchain-userland.cmake file to be
able to use it, and this is what I came up with:
set(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Linux)
set(CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR arm)
set(MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN
/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/toolchain_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf)
set(MY_CLANG_TOOLCHAIN
/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/toolchain_userland_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf)
SET(CROSS_MACHINE_FLAGS "-marm -mcpu=cortex-a53 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=vfp")
set(MY_COMMON_COMPILE_FLAGS "--target=arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf
${CROSS_MACHINE_FLAGS} --gcc-toolchain=${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr")
set(MY_COMMON_LINKER_FLAGS "--target=arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf -B
${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/bin -fuse-ld=bfd
-L${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/lib
-L${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/lib/gcc/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/7.2.0
--gcc-toolchain=${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr")
set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER ${MY_CLANG_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/bin/clang)
set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER ${MY_CLANG_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/bin/clang++)
set(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-fwrapv -fno-ident ${MY_COMMON_COMPILE_FLAGS} " CACHE
STRING "OpenADK CFLAGS" FORCE)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-fwrapv -fno-ident -stdlib=libstdc++
-I${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/include/c++/7.2.0
-I${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/include/c++/7.2.0/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf
${MY_COMMON_COMPILE_FLAGS}" CACHE STRING "OpenADK CXXFLAGS" FORCE)
set(CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS ${MY_COMMON_LINKER_FLAGS} CACHE STRING "OpenADK
LDFLAGS" FORCE)
set(CMAKE_MODULE_LINKER_FLAGS ${MY_COMMON_LINKER_FLAGS} CACHE STRING "OpenADK
LDFLAGS" FORCE)
set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS ${MY_COMMON_LINKER_FLAGS} CACHE STRING "OpenADK
LDFLAGS" FORCE)
set(CMAKE_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS ${MY_COMMON_LINKER_FLAGS} CACHE STRING "OpenADK
LDFLAGS" FORCE)
set(MY_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_DIRS
${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/include/c++/7.2.0
${MY_GCC_TOOLCHAIN}/usr/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf/include/c++/7.2.0/arm-openadk-linux-uclibceabihf)
set(CMAKE_INSTALL_SO_NO_EXE 0)
set(CMAKE_PROGRAM_PATH
"/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/host_x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0/usr/bin")
set(CMAKE_SYSROOT
"/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/target_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf")
set(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH
"/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/target_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf")
set(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_PROGRAM NEVER)
set(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_PACKAGE ONLY)
set(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY ONLY)
set(CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_INCLUDE ONLY)
set(ENV{PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR}
"/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/target_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf")
set(ENV{PKG_CONFIG_LIBDIR}
"/Volumes/CASE/my-os-pi3/target_raspberry-pi3-cm_uclibc-ng_cortex_a53_hard_eabihf/usr/lib/pkgconfig:@@STAGING_TARGET_DIR@@/usr/share/pkgconfig")
Note: First I tried using -fuse-ld=lld but it can not build the final app: it keeps
searching in /lib/ on my host for libc.so.1 and 2 other libs(uclibc libs). If I then add
-nostdlib then cmake can compile his testprograms for C and C++. And then all the shared
libs of my app build fine, except when linking the final application with all of these
libs, it does not find some cxx11 strings and sigint functions: it indicates several
undefined references. Weird because I say -stdlib=libstdc++, and those undefined
references look like libc++ ones.
So I switched to using the standard “bfd” linker and this compiles and links my libs+app
fine. Compilation time is now down to 2 minutes, so I already like it ;)
But, running it failed, but the only thing that I had to do was add a symlink
/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 pointing to /lib/ld-uClibc-1.0.26.so and then it runs on my
target system.
When I run it, it all seems to work, but an exception thrown from within one of the shared
libraries is not caught in the main application. It just hangs there at that particular
line. So I tried with the regular toolchain.cmake file (which uses gcc) and there that
also didn’t work.
So then I removed the "-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unwind-tables
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables” options(hardcoded in vars.mk) and rebuild my entire os.
Then using the gcc toolchain, it worked fine, and the exception coming from the shared lib
was caught in the main application.
But trying that now with the clang toolchain, it still hangs in the shared lib… So
try-catch and exceptions work inside these libs, but when one is uncaught, it just hangs
there.
So now I have the situation where it almost works, but these exceptions are now the only
remaining problem I have. Any clues what could be wrong still?
Thanks
Best regards,
Tom,
14 Jun
14 Jun
4:08 a.m.
Hi Tom,
Tom Deblauwe wrote,
Hello,
I am using openadk on the raspberry pi 3, and have an appliance where I have
one main application that is running all the time.
So I am using gcc 7.2.0 from openadk, and compilation starts to be *very slow*
with gcc: 10 minutes for a full rebuild... So I am looking into having the
clang toolchain available next to the gcc one so I can compile only my
application with clang, which is faster.
I have several shared libraries I also compile myself as part of my application
build, all using cmake.
Nice use case (llvm for userland).
Note: First I tried using -fuse-ld=lld but it can not
build the final app: it
keeps searching in /lib/ on my host for libc.so.1 and 2 other libs(uclibc
libs). If I then add -nostdlib then cmake can compile his testprograms for C
and C++. And then all the shared libs of my app build fine, except when linking
the final application with all of these libs, it does not find some cxx11
strings and sigint functions: it indicates several undefined references. Weird
because I say -stdlib=libstdc++, and those undefined references look like
libc++ ones.
So I switched to using the standard “bfd” linker and this compiles and links my
libs+app fine. Compilation time is now down to 2 minutes, so I already like it
;)
But, running it failed, but the only thing that I had to do was add a symlink /
lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 pointing to /lib/ld-uClibc-1.0.26.so and then it runs
on my target system.
I believe llvm/clang doesn't know anything about uClibc-ng and the
shared library loader as gcc does.
When I run it, it all seems to work, but an exception
thrown from within one of
the shared libraries is not caught in the main application. It just hangs there
at that particular line. So I tried with the regular toolchain.cmake file
(which uses gcc) and there that also didn’t work.
So then I removed the "-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unwind-tables
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables” options(hardcoded in vars.mk) and rebuild my
entire os. Then using the gcc toolchain, it worked fine, and the exception
coming from the shared lib was caught in the main application.
I hope I fixed it in c0c6ccec7881c92e0a96fa9114af553c4434d83b.
They are no longer hardcoded and must be enabled by the
developer/user.
But trying that now with the clang toolchain, it still
hangs in the shared lib…
So try-catch and exceptions work inside these libs, but when one is uncaught,
it just hangs there.
So now I have the situation where it almost works, but these exceptions are now
the only remaining problem I have. Any clues what could be wrong still?
Sounds like some llvm/clang bug not generating the right code?
In both cases you have libgcc.so.1 on your target, which is used
inside uClibc-ng/glibc. I am not sure if it is relevant to C++
exception handling. C++ is a mystique for me.
You could verify with glibc, if the remaining issue is
llvm+uClibc-ng related. If it breaks for a gflibc system, it
shouldn't be related.
Could you prepare a patch against master, so that others can benefit
from your LLVM for userland system?
best regards
Waldemar
20 Jun
20 Jun
3:33 p.m.
Hello,
I changed to using glibc and it works now! Thanks for the tip…
I will look into giving my changes back, but now I am short on time unfortunately, but I
will do it.
Best regards,
Tom,
On 14 Jun 2018, at 06:08, Waldemar Brodkorb
<wbx(a)openadk.org> wrote:
Hi Tom,
Tom Deblauwe wrote,
Hello,
I am using openadk on the raspberry pi 3, and have an appliance where I have
one main application that is running all the time.
So I am using gcc 7.2.0 from openadk, and compilation starts to be *very slow*
with gcc: 10 minutes for a full rebuild... So I am looking into having the
clang toolchain available next to the gcc one so I can compile only my
application with clang, which is faster.
I have several shared libraries I also compile myself as part of my application
build, all using cmake.
Nice use case (llvm for userland).
Note: First I tried using -fuse-ld=lld but it can
not build the final app: it
keeps searching in /lib/ on my host for libc.so.1 and 2 other libs(uclibc
libs). If I then add -nostdlib then cmake can compile his testprograms for C
and C++. And then all the shared libs of my app build fine, except when linking
the final application with all of these libs, it does not find some cxx11
strings and sigint functions: it indicates several undefined references. Weird
because I say -stdlib=libstdc++, and those undefined references look like
libc++ ones.
So I switched to using the standard “bfd” linker and this compiles and links my
libs+app fine. Compilation time is now down to 2 minutes, so I already like it
;)
But, running it failed, but the only thing that I had to do was add a symlink /
lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 pointing to /lib/ld-uClibc-1.0.26.so and then it runs
on my target system.
I believe llvm/clang doesn't know anything about uClibc-ng and the
shared library loader as gcc does.
When I run it, it all seems to work, but an
exception thrown from within one of
the shared libraries is not caught in the main application. It just hangs there
at that particular line. So I tried with the regular toolchain.cmake file
(which uses gcc) and there that also didn’t work.
So then I removed the "-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-unwind-tables
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables” options(hardcoded in vars.mk) and rebuild my
entire os. Then using the gcc toolchain, it worked fine, and the exception
coming from the shared lib was caught in the main application.
I hope I fixed it in c0c6ccec7881c92e0a96fa9114af553c4434d83b.
They are no longer hardcoded and must be enabled by the
developer/user.
But trying that now with the clang toolchain, it
still hangs in the shared lib…
So try-catch and exceptions work inside these libs, but when one is uncaught,
it just hangs there.
So now I have the situation where it almost works, but these exceptions are now
the only remaining problem I have. Any clues what could be wrong still?
Sounds like some llvm/clang bug not generating the right code?
In both cases you have libgcc.so.1 on your target, which is used
inside uClibc-ng/glibc. I am not sure if it is relevant to C++
exception handling. C++ is a mystique for me.
You could verify with glibc, if the remaining issue is
llvm+uClibc-ng related. If it breaks for a gflibc system, it
shouldn't be related.
Could you prepare a patch against master, so that others can benefit
from your LLVM for userland system?
best regards
Waldemar
2456
days inactive
2463
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Tom Deblauwe -
Waldemar Brodkorb