15 Jun
2020
15 Jun
'20
2:14 p.m.
Hi,
All is fine. I have just seen that the latest dhcpcd is compiling fine with out the patch,
but I will apply anyway.
Best regards
Waldemar
Am 15.06.2020 um 15:55 schrieb Ed W
<lists(a)wildgooses.com>om>:
Hi, Any feedback on this? I'm probably not submitting patches in the correct style -
please guide me on what you need?
Thanks
Ed W
On 11/06/2020 17:57, Ed W wrote:
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel(a)uclibc-ng.org
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel On 11/06/2020 17:20, Ed W wrote:
Hi!
Haha! So obvious now that you've pointed it out!! Yes, I confirm that this is the
problem! I never even thought to look for such macros upstream! Thanks!
OK, can I propose a patch to uclibc-ng to change the naming of the unused fields to
include "uclibc" in the name. This is in the style of glibc, which does the same
(only with __glibc_unused)
Signed off: Ed Wildgoose <lists(a)wildgooses.com>
Apologies. Previous patch was obviously useless... I'm tired and not thinking before
writing. More useful patch submitted, it amends all architectures and renames the spare
fields to include a namespace (__uclibc_).
Patch created with:
sed -i -e 's/__unused/__uclibc_unused/' libc/sysdeps/linux/*/bits/*stat.h
This is inline with what glibc is doing, they tend to call spare fields either
__glibc_unused or __glibc_reserved
Thanks so much for putting me on the right track to resolving this
Ed W
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel(a)uclibc-ng.org
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel