Hi,
All is fine. I have just seen that the latest dhcpcd is compiling
fine with out the patch, but I will apply anyway.
Best regards
Waldemar
Am 15.06.2020 um 15:55 schrieb Ed W
<lists(a)wildgooses.com>om>:
Hi, Any feedback on this? I'm probably not submitting patches in
the correct style - please guide me on what you need?
Thanks
Ed W
On 11/06/2020 17:57, Ed W wrote:
> On 11/06/2020 17:20, Ed W wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Haha! So obvious now that you've pointed it out!! Yes, I confirm
> that this is the problem! I never even thought to look for such
> macros upstream! Thanks!
>
> OK, can I propose a patch to uclibc-ng to change the naming of the
> unused fields to include "uclibc" in the name. This is in the
> style of glibc, which does the same (only with __glibc_unused)
>
> Signed off: Ed Wildgoose <lists(a)wildgooses.com>
Apologies. Previous patch was obviously useless... I'm tired and
not thinking before writing. More useful patch submitted, it amends
all architectures and renames the spare fields to include a
namespace (__uclibc_).
Patch created with:
sed -i -e 's/__unused/__uclibc_unused/'
libc/sysdeps/linux/*/bits/*stat.h
This is inline with what glibc is doing, they tend to call spare
fields either __glibc_unused or __glibc_reserved
Thanks so much for putting me on the right track to resolving this
Ed W
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel(a)uclibc-ng.org
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel(a)uclibc-ng.org
https://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel(a)uclibc-ng.org