Hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx(a)uclibc-ng.org>
wrote:
Hi,
Leonid Lisovskiy wrote,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Waldemar
Brodkorb <wbx(a)uclibc-ng.org>
wrote:
Currently, we need just to know that library was opened more than
once. Sorry if DL_OPENED2 name introduces misunderstanding, I could
easily rename it to any better variant.
Than may be we should rename it to a better variant.
Could you resend v2 with that fixed?
Of course, yes. What name is the best from your point of view?
No idea. I just dislike DL_OPENED2 if no DL_OPENED is in use :)
Sorry for chiming in, but what about 'DL_REOPENED'? This exactly implies
that the lib has already been twice at the least, and no misleading '2'
suffix :)
--
Best regards,
Alex Potapenko